In which I get my geek on
I don't know how I feel about this new idea to call the plosives /b/, /d/ and /g/ (well, apparently it goes for all voiced sounds) 'lenis' instead of 'voiced'. I'm very averse to change. /b/, /d/ and /g/ are voiced plosives, and that's that, just as /v/ is a voiced fricative. (And /ʒ/ is a voiced sibilant, but more on that later.)
It's almost as strange as suddenly having to think of /k/ and /g/ as velar sounds. "What do you mean, velar? They're palatal! Stupid book," was my intital reaction. Then I started saying 'car' and 'gone' to myself, and fine, maybe they are more velar than palatal in English.
I don't like this book much. They don't even mention sibilant consonants, I don't think. I can't find the term anywhere, anyway. And that's just rude to the poor sibilants. They shouldn't have to put up with just being lumped in with the all the other fricatives. They've deserved their subcategory.
The straw that breaks my back, however? The mandible isn't mentioned, either. *weeps* How can you write a book on phonetics and not take the opportunity to use an awesome word like 'mandible'?
Regardless of this, though, it really is a lot of fun reading about phonetics and phonology again. Brings back memories of revising madly for Pär's exams, hundreds of questions in front of you, trying to remember what the perturbation theory was about, to be able to tell the thyroid cartilage from the cricoid cartilage, and remember what the subglottic pressure is.
(7 cm water, in case you were wondering.)
When we first started with phonetics during that first term I never thought I'd say this, but I've missed it. A lot of it is different from the stuff we did then - clearly, since the sounds differ - but it's great getting to delve into it again.
It's almost as strange as suddenly having to think of /k/ and /g/ as velar sounds. "What do you mean, velar? They're palatal! Stupid book," was my intital reaction. Then I started saying 'car' and 'gone' to myself, and fine, maybe they are more velar than palatal in English.
I don't like this book much. They don't even mention sibilant consonants, I don't think. I can't find the term anywhere, anyway. And that's just rude to the poor sibilants. They shouldn't have to put up with just being lumped in with the all the other fricatives. They've deserved their subcategory.
The straw that breaks my back, however? The mandible isn't mentioned, either. *weeps* How can you write a book on phonetics and not take the opportunity to use an awesome word like 'mandible'?
Regardless of this, though, it really is a lot of fun reading about phonetics and phonology again. Brings back memories of revising madly for Pär's exams, hundreds of questions in front of you, trying to remember what the perturbation theory was about, to be able to tell the thyroid cartilage from the cricoid cartilage, and remember what the subglottic pressure is.
(7 cm water, in case you were wondering.)
When we first started with phonetics during that first term I never thought I'd say this, but I've missed it. A lot of it is different from the stuff we did then - clearly, since the sounds differ - but it's great getting to delve into it again.